Which statement about Article 15 is true?

Which statement about Article 15 is true?

• A. Non-judicial punishment is not permitted under UCMJ.
• B. Non-judicial punishment for minor offenses committed by Soldiers.
• C. It automatically results in a court-martial.
• D. It applies only to officers.

Answer: (B)

Non-judicial punishment under Article 15 is a way to discipline service members for minor offenses without going through a court-martial. It gives a commanding officer the authority to address less serious misconduct quickly, while still upholding military discipline. The penalties can include extra duties, restriction, forfeiture of pay, or a reprimand, and they’re designed to be corrective rather than punitive in the formality of a court-martial. This fits the statement best because it specifically describes NJP being used for minor offenses by Soldiers (enlisted personnel), which is exactly the scenario Article 15 covers. The other options are inaccurate: NJP exists under the UCMJ, it doesn’t automatically lead to a court-martial, and it isn’t limited to officers.

Non-judicial punishment under Article 15 is a way to discipline service members for minor offenses without going through a court-martial. It gives a commanding officer the authority to address less serious misconduct quickly, while still upholding military discipline. The penalties can include extra duties, restriction, forfeiture of pay, or a reprimand, and they’re designed to be corrective rather than punitive in the formality of a court-martial. This fits the statement best because it specifically describes NJP being used for minor offenses by Soldiers (enlisted personnel), which is exactly the scenario Article 15 covers. The other options are inaccurate: NJP exists under the UCMJ, it doesn’t automatically lead to a court-martial, and it isn’t limited to officers.